I recently started using the cppwinrt library which brought chances dealing with the new C++ standard(yet) coroutine. The cppwinrt recommends using C++ coroutines instead of PPL while handling async operations. Refer to the following github issues for more information:
https://github.com/Microsoft/cppwinrt/issues/54
https://github.com/Microsoft/cppwinrt/issues/46
Although the coroutine concept itself might feel coming familiar because we’re already exposed async programming concept much from python asyncio, C# async/await experiences, however the C++ coroutine requires few prerequisite concepts, predefined structures and functions just in order to begin with. I had absolute no idea those, so I decided to start digging in to understand how things orchestrate and work under the hood.
Fortunately, James McNellis from the Microsoft VC++ team had an introductory talk “Introduction to C++ Coroutines” from the cppcon 2016. The talk is great. You really should watch it first if you want to learn the C++ coroutine. However, it feels like a little ambiguous. So that I decided to write actual codes what he had shown from his slides and test it.
So at the very beginning, I created the simplest C++ console project from the Visual Studio 2015 Update 3.
First, changed the warning level,

Typed the simple awaitable function shown from the slide and tried build it.

And of course the compiler failed to build and showed the following error:
1>—— Build started: Project: resumable-concept, Configuration: Debug x64 ——
1> Skipping… (no relevant changes detected)
1> stdafx.cpp
1> resumable-concept.cpp
1>d:\workspace\playground\async_research\resumable-idea\resumable-idea\resumable-concept.cpp(10): error C3773: please use /await compiler switch to enable coroutines
1>d:\workspace\playground\async_research\resumable-idea\resumable-idea\resumable-concept.cpp(13): error C3774: cannot find ‘std::experimental’: Please include <experimental/resumable> header
1>d:\workspace\playground\async_research\resumable-idea\resumable-idea\resumable-concept.cpp(15): error C3773: please use /await compiler switch to enable coroutines
1>d:\workspace\playground\async_research\resumable-idea\resumable-idea\resumable-concept.cpp(20): error C2228: left of ‘.get’ must have class/struct/union
========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ==========
So I added the /await option as the error indicated:

Also included required header files at stdafx.h:
And tried build again…….
Succeeded!
1>—— Rebuild All started: Project: resumable-concept, Configuration: Debug x64 ——
1> stdafx.cpp
1> resumable-concept.cpp
1> resumable-idea.vcxproj -> D:\workspace\playground\async_research\resumable-idea\x64\Debug\resumable-concept.exe
1> resumable-idea.vcxproj -> D:\workspace\playground\async_research\resumable-idea\x64\Debug\resumable-concept.pdb (Full PDB)
========== Rebuild All: 1 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 skipped ==========
Let’s see what the co_await actually does in detail:
From the cppcon talk,

He explains that if we use the co_await keyword, the compiler will generate the code shown on the right. Which means in order to work with the co_await keyword, someone should provide the required functions such as await_ready, await_suspend, await_resume, so from the next page it introduces the ‘awaitable_concept’ structure which has the all functions mentioned.

For example, we used the std::future from the first sample, and you’ll see the following snippets if you open the future std header file and search ‘await_ready’ string.

If so, how can you make your own type to awaitable to work with co_await instead of using std::future?
From the cppcon talk, James explains it type named ‘resumable_thing’.

Let’s type exactly same code he’d shown us and try build it. I added the ‘resume()’ class method which is not listed from the slide but to work. This is to see what functions exactly required to be implemented to work with co_await keyword.
You’ll get following errors when you build the example:
1>—— Build started: Project: resumable-concept, Configuration: Debug x64 ——
1> resumable-concept.cpp
1>d:\devtools\vs14\vc\include\experimental\resumable(44): error C2039: ‘promise_type’: is not a member of ‘resumable_thing’
1> d:\workspace\playground\async_research\resumable-idea\resumable-idea\resumable-concept.cpp(9): note: see declaration of ‘resumable_thing’
1> d:\workspace\playground\async_research\resumable-idea\resumable-idea\resumable-concept.cpp(17): note: see reference to class template instantiation ‘std::experimental::coroutine_traits<resumable_thing>’ being compiled
1>d:\devtools\vs14\vc\include\experimental\resumable(44): error C2061: syntax error: identifier ‘promise_type’
1>d:\devtools\vs14\vc\include\experimental\resumable(44): error C2238: unexpected token(s) preceding ‘;’
1>d:\workspace\playground\async_research\resumable-idea\resumable-idea\resumable-concept.cpp(25): error C2440: ‘initializing’: cannot convert from ‘resumable_thing (__cdecl *)(void)’ to ‘resumable_thing’
1> d:\workspace\playground\async_research\resumable-idea\resumable-idea\resumable-concept.cpp(25): note: No constructor could take the source type, or constructor overload resolution was ambiguous
========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ==========
Double clicked the first error line to move to exact error location,
1>d:\devtools\vs14\vc\include\experimental\resumable(44): error C2039: ‘promise_type’: is not a member of ‘resumable_thing’
namespace experimental {
// TEMPLATE CLASS coroutine_traits
template <typename
_Ret, typename… _Ts>
struct
coroutine_traits
{
using
promise_type = typename
_Ret::promise_type;
};

As you see, the compiler failed to template instantiate coroutine_traits<resumable_thing> because the promise_type is not declared from resumable_thing.
If so, let’s fill up the remaining method implementations as the slide shows:

Finally works as expected:

If so, what exactly happening from the ‘counter’ coroutine function returns resumable_thing? From the talk, the slide shows the following pseudo code:

If you’re stepping into the assembly code while debugging, you’ll see similar functions are actually implemented:


First of all, it starts its async operation by calling the ‘InitCoro$1’. If you stepped into the inside ‘InitCoro$1’ function, you’ll see the function implements prologue what the next image suggests as the first three lines:


00B12A41 call std::experimental::_Resumable_helper_traits<resumable_thing>::_ConstructPromise (0B1132Ah)
00B12A46 add esp,0Ch
00B12A49 mov byte ptr [ebp-4],1
00B12A4D lea eax,[ebp-0D1h]
00B12A53 push eax
00B12A54 mov ecx,dword ptr [<coro_frame_ptr>]
00B12A57 push ecx
00B12A58 call std::experimental::_Resumable_helper_traits<resumable_thing>::_Promise_from_frame (0B11217h)
00B12A5D add esp,4
00B12A60 mov ecx,eax
00B12A62 call resumable_thing::promise_type::initial_suspend (0B111EFh)
00B12A67 mov dl,byte ptr [eax]
00B12A69 movzx eax,dl
00B12A6C push eax
00B12A6D mov ecx,80h
00B12A72 add ecx,dword ptr [<coro_frame_ptr>]
00B12A75 call `counter’::`5′::<parameters>::<parameters> (0B11FC0h)
00B12A7A mov eax,dword ptr [__$ReturnUdt]
00B12A7D push eax
00B12A7E mov ecx,dword ptr [<coro_frame_ptr>]
00B12A81 push ecx
00B12A82 call std::experimental::_Resumable_helper_traits<resumable_thing>::_Promise_from_frame (0B11217h)
00B12A87 add esp,4
00B12A8A mov ecx,eax
00B12A8C call resumable_thing::promise_type::get_return_object (0B11479h)
00B12A91 mov dword ptr [ebp-4],2
00B12A98 mov ecx,80h
00B12A9D add ecx,dword ptr [<coro_frame_ptr>]
00B12AA0 call std::experimental::suspend_never::await_ready (0B11348h)
00B12AA5 movzx eax,al
00B12AA8 test eax,eax
00B12AAA je counter$_InitCoro$1+0CAh (0B12ABAh)
00B12AAC mov ecx,dword ptr [<coro_frame_ptr>]
00B12AAF push ecx
00B12AB0 call counter$_ResumeCoro$2 (0B12B70h)
00B12AB5 add esp,4
00B12AB8 jmp counter$_InitCoro$1+103h (0B12AF3h)
}
It first creates the Promise instance:
00B12A41 call std::experimental::_Resumable_helper_traits<resumable_thing>::_ConstructPromise (0B1132Ah)
The function creates it by calling the std::experimental::_Resumable_helper_traits<resumable_thing>::_ConstructPromise(void *, void *, int) function which is implemented at “\VC\include\experimental\resumable”
If you open the file and see the code,
static
void _ConstructPromise(void *_Addr, void *_Resume_addr, int
_HeapElision)
{
*reinterpret_cast<void **>(_Addr) = _Resume_addr;
*reinterpret_cast<uint32_t *>(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(_Addr) +
sizeof(void *)) = 2 + (_HeapElision ? 0 : 0x10000);
auto _Prom = _Promise_from_frame(_Addr);
::new (static_cast<void *>(_Prom)) _PromiseT();
}
It instantiates the promise_type which is defined within resumable_thing from our example. After instantiated, initial_suspend() will be executed as the deck explained.

As a next step, resumable_thing::promise_type::get_return_object() will be called. The resumable_thing instance is getting created from this get_return_object().

The prologue pseudo code explained that _promise.initial_suspend() will be called as a next step, and from the our example, the resumable_thing::promise_type::initial_suspend() returns suspend_never{}. So suspend_never::await_ready is getting called as next.
Finally, if we step into the function counter$_ResumeCoro$2(void) which is below:

There exists actual counter() function implementation if we stepped into resumeCoro. Later when the the_counter.resume() ran, Instruction Pointer is transferred same as if the resumeCoro ran.
Next time, let’s see how the cppwinrt overloads co_await operator and utilize it.
One thought on “Beginning the coroutine with Visual Studio 2015 Update 3 Part 1”